Chapter 2

 Name: Le Tran Phuong Uyen 

Class: Computer assisted Language Learning 

Date: Oct,10,2024

BO SEO 

Bo Seo shares a story of a debate he had in topic 2 of his book "Good Argument." In light of this, he emphasizes the value of listening to and being humble when interacting with others who hold different opinions and how doing so can result in more fruitful conversations. Those are taken directly from his school debates. Bo Seo is aware that rather than seeing arguments as chances to learn and develop, many individuals saw them as contests to be won. But doing so might polarize people and complicate the conversation. He thus exhorts readers to view arguments as chances for cooperation and increased comprehension. 

Bo Seo emphasizes the need of listening in this situation on both sides.According to him, in order to have a productive debate, one must be able to understand the other person's point of view, which entails listening intently and seeing the problem from their point of view. As a result of coming to an agreement, conversations might become more fruitful and respectful. He also provides some instances of discussions in which those who are empathetic can bond and cooperate to find solutions. He also stresses how important humility is. You can facilitate more casual and friendly talks by acknowledging your ignorance and your desire to learn from others. People reply more openly and honestly when they are made to feel important and heard.In addition to humility and empathy, clarity is essential in communicating. When expressing your own viewpoint, you must be precise and succinct. Seo cautions against oversimplifying complicated matters, pointing out that most topics with various facets can contribute to more diverse conversations.

In conclusion, subject 2 demonstrates that a strong argument involves more than just persuasion—it also entails learning and fostering relationships. Meaningful conversations can occur when people listen, acknowledge, and communicate clearly. Lastly, the author challenges readers to view disagreement in an argument as a chance for cooperation rather than conflict, resulting in more courteous and fruitful discussions.